Foxglove Studio
Per-seat visualization + MCAP-first workflows; common baseline for robotics teams reviewing bags.
We are not replacing Foxglove — we sit downstream of review, at train-ready packaging + contract enforcement.
Pricing
Anchored to comps, not guesswork.
Public list pricing is premature while the ingest contract and CPU pipeline are in active design-partner iterations. Instead, we benchmark buyer expectations against products teams already pay for today.
Roboflow
Tiered SaaS for labeling + model ops; approachable entry pricing for CV teams.
BR targets egocentric **teleop / ingest** vendors standardizing what they hand to buyers, not general labeling SKUs.
Scale / Nucleus-style catalogs
Enterprise contracts for curated dataset delivery + QA gates.
We anchor buyer trust on **signed manifests + schema version pins**, not marketplace listing fees.
Design partner phase
What we optimize for first
- One real capture path (MP4 or MCAP) → `episode.yaml` that validates without hand-editing YAML.
- Ed25519-signed `release_manifest.json` verifiable with `br-pipeline verify` + a published public key.
- Buyer acceptance profile (Base vs Production) agreed before data moves.
See the outreach checklist in the repo docs: `docs/strategy/design-partner-outreach.md`.